Get PDF Affirmative Action in Perspective (Recent Research in Psychology)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Affirmative Action in Perspective (Recent Research in Psychology) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Affirmative Action in Perspective (Recent Research in Psychology) book. Happy reading Affirmative Action in Perspective (Recent Research in Psychology) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Affirmative Action in Perspective (Recent Research in Psychology) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Affirmative Action in Perspective (Recent Research in Psychology) Pocket Guide.


  1. Impact Over the Long Haul
  2. Looking at Affirmative Action in a New Light
  3. Partner Sites
  4. U Mich Affirmative Action: A Case for Psychological Science
  5. Social Psychology Links by Subtopic

Back to top. Get to Know Us. Amazon Payment Products. English Choose a language for shopping. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.

Impact Over the Long Haul

Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. Sell on Amazon Start a Selling Account. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. DPReview Digital Photography. East Dane Designer Men's Fashion. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands.

Deals and Shenanigans. Ring Smart Home Security Systems. PillPack Pharmacy Simplified. Amazon Renewed Like-new products you can trust. BEE focuses more on employment equality rather than taking wealth away from the skilled white labourers. The main goal of Affirmative Action is for a country to reach its full potential. This occurrence would result in a completely diverse workforce in economic and social sectors. Thus broadening the economic base and therefore stimulating economic growth.

Once applied within the country, many different outcomes arose, some positive and some negative. This depended on the approach to and the view of The Employment Equality Act and affirmative action. Positive: Pre-Democracy, the apartheid governments discriminated against non-white races, so with affirmative action, the country started to redress past discriminations. Affirmative action also focused on combating structural racism and racial inequality, hoping to maximize diversity in all levels of society and sectors. Negative: Though affirmative action had its positives, negatives arose.

A quota system was implemented, which aimed to achieve targets of diversity in a work force. This target affected the hiring and level of skill in the work force, ultimately affecting the free market. This created a bigger gap between the lower and middle class, which led to class struggles and a greater segregation.

Many believe that affirmative action is discrimination in reverse. With all these negatives, much talent started to leave the country. This is due to very few international companies wanting to invest in South Africa. With these negative and positive outcomes of affirmative action, it is evident that the concept of affirmative action is continually evolving. There is affirmative action in education for minority nationalities. This may equate to lowering minimum requirements for the National University Entrance Examination, which is a mandatory exam for all students to enter university.

Further, minority students enrolled in ethnic minority-oriented specialties e. A class-based affirmative action policy was incorporated into the admission practices of the four most selective universities in Israel during the early to mids. In evaluating the eligibility of applicants, neither their financial status nor their national or ethnic origins are considered. The emphasis, rather, is on structural disadvantages, especially neighborhood socioeconomic status and high school rigor, although several individual hardships are also weighed.

This policy made the four institutions, especially the echelons at the most selective departments, more diverse than they otherwise would have been. The rise in geographic, economic and demographic diversity of a student population suggests that the plan's focus on structural determinants of disadvantage yields broad diversity dividends. Israeli citizens who are; Women, Arabs, Blacks or people with disabilities are entitled to Affirmative Action in the civil service employment.

In her study of gender politics in Israel, Dafna Izraeli showed that the paradox of affirmative action for women directors is that the legitimation for legislating their inclusion on boards also resulted in the exclusion of women's interested as a legitimate issue on the boards' agendas. In the negotiation for status as worthy peers, emphasizing gender signals that a woman is an "imposter", someone who does not rightfully belong in the position she is claiming to fill.

This suggests that affirmative action can have applications for different groups in Israel. Reservation in India is a form of affirmative action designed to improve the well-being of backward and under-represented communities defined primarily by their caste. Malaysia provides affirmative action to the majority because in general, the Malays have lower incomes than the Chinese, who have traditionally been involved in businesses and industries, but who were also general migrant workers.

In the Standardization policy of Sri Lankan universities was introduced as an affirmative action program for students from areas which had lower rates of education than other areas due to missionary activity in the north and east, which essentially were the Tamil areas. Successive governments cultivated a historical myth after the colonial powers had left that the British had practised communal favouritism towards Christians and the minority Tamil community for the entire years they had controlled Sri Lanka.

However, the Sinhalese in fact benefitted from trade and plantation cultivations over the rest of the other groups and their language and culture as well as the religion of Buddhism was fostered and made into mediums for schools over the Tamil language, which did not have the same treatment and Tamils learned English instead as there was no medium for Tamil until near independence. Tamils' knowledge of English and education came from the very American missionary activity by overseas Christians that the British were concerned will anger the Sinhalese and destroy their trading relationships, so they sent them to the Tamil areas instead to teach, thinking it would have no consequences and due to their small numbers.

The British sending the missionaries to the north and east was for the protection of the Sinhalese and in fact showed favouritism to the majority group instead of the minorities to maintain trading relationships and benefits from them. The Tamils, out of this random benefit from learning English and basic education excelled and flourished and were able to take many civil service jobs to the chagrin of the Sinhalese. The myth of Divide and Rule is untrue. The 'policy of standardisation' was typical of affirmative action policies, in that it required drastically lower standards for Sinhalese students than for the more academic Tamils who had to get about ten more marks to enter into universities.

The policy, were it not implemented would have prevented the civil wars ahead as the policies had no basis and in fact is an example of discrimination against the Tamil ethnic group. A legislation requires that, for a firm with employees or more wishing to compete for government contracts, at least 1 per cent of its employees must be Taiwanese aborigines.

In certain university education programs, including legal and medical education, there are quotas for persons who reach a certain standard of skills in the Swedish language ; for students admitted in these quotas, the education is partially arranged in Swedish. In addition to these linguistic quotas, women may get preferential treatment in recruitment for certain public sector jobs if there is a gender imbalance in the field. No distinctions based on race, religion or sex are allowed under the French Constitution.

Some schools, in neighborhoods labeled "Priority Education Zones", are granted more funds than the others. Students from these schools also benefit from special policies in certain institutions such as Sciences Po. The French Ministry of Defence tried in to make it easier for young French soldiers of North-African descent to be promoted in rank and obtain driving licenses.

After the Sarkozy election, a new attempt in favour of Arab-French students was made, but Sarkozy did not gain enough political support to change the French constitution. However, some French schools do implement affirmative action in that they are obligated to take a certain number of students from impoverished families. All appointments of males as directors will be invalid as long as the quota is not met, and monetary penalties may apply for other directors. Article 3 of the German Basic Law provides for equal rights of all people regardless of sex, race or social background.

There are programs stating that if men and women have equal qualifications, women have to be preferred for a job; moreover, the disabled should be preferred to non-disabled people. This is typical for all positions in state and university service as of [update] , typically using the phrase "We try to increase diversity in this line of work".

In recent years, there has been a long public debate about whether to issue programs that would grant women a privileged access to jobs in order to fight discrimination. Germany's Left Party brought up the discussion about affirmative action in Germany's school system. According to Stefan Zillich , quotas should be "a possibility" to help working class children who did not do well in school gain access to a Gymnasium University-preparatory school. This suggests that the law has had a marginal effect on the sex of the chair and the boards remain internally segregated.

Although at the beginning of our observation period, only 7 of 91 prominent directors were women. The gender balance among prominent directors has changed considerable through the period, and at the end of the period, women and men were prominent directors. By applying more restrictive definitions of prominence, the proportion of directors who are women generally increases. If only considering directors with at least three directorships, When considering directors with seven or more directorships, all of them are women.

Thus, affirmative action increase the female population in the director position. A study found no effect of the ASA representation requirement on either valuation or profits of the affected companies, and also no correlation between the requirement and the restructuring of companies away from ASA. Romani people are allocated quotas for access to public schools and state universities. Quota systems existed in the USSR for various social groups including ethnic minorities as a compensation of their " cultural backwardness " , women and factory workers. Quotas for access to university education, offices in the Soviet system and the Communist Party existed: for example, the position of First Secretary of a Soviet Republic's or Autonomous Republic's Party Committee was always filled by a representative of this republic's " titular ethnicity ".

Modern Russia retains this system partially. Quotas are abolished, however, preferences for some ethnic minorities and inhabitants of certain territories [66] remain. The Constitutional Court declared in October that affirmative action i. In the UK, any discrimination, quotas or favouritism due to sex, race and ethnicity among other "protected characteristics" is generally illegal for any reason in education, employment, during commercial transactions, in a private club or association, and while using public services.

In , an employment tribunal ruled that, while attempting to create a diverse force, the Cheshire Police had discriminated against a "well prepared" white heterosexual male. The ruling stated that "while positive action can be used to boost diversity, it should only be applied to distinguish between candidates who were all equally well qualified for a role". The equality section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms explicitly permits affirmative action type legislation, although the Charter does not require legislation that gives preferential treatment.

Subsection 2 of Section 15 states that the equality provisions do "not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability". The Canadian Employment Equity Act requires employers in federally-regulated industries to give preferential treatment to four designated groups: Women, persons with disabilities, aboriginal peoples, and visible minorities.

Less than one-third of Canadian Universities offer alternative admission requirements for students of aboriginal descent. Some provinces and territories also have affirmative action-type policies. For example, in Northwest Territories in the Canadian north, aboriginal people are given preference for jobs and education and are considered to have P1 status.

Non-aboriginal people who were born in the NWT or have resided half of their life there are considered a P2, as well as women and people with disabilities. The concept of affirmative action was introduced in the early s in the United States, as a way to combat racial discrimination in the hiring process, with the concept later expanded to address gender discrimination.

Looking at Affirmative Action in a New Light

Kennedy on 6 March and required that government employers "not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, or national origin" and "take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin". On 24 September , President Lyndon B. Johnson signed Executive Order , thereby replacing Executive Order and affirming Federal Government's commitment "to promote the full realization of equal employment opportunity through a positive, continuing program in each executive department and agency".

In the U. These groups are protected from discrimination under different laws. Affirmative action has been the subject of numerous court cases, [77] and has been questioned upon its constitutional legitimacy. In , a Supreme Court decision regarding affirmative action in higher education Grutter v. Bollinger , US — Supreme Court permitted educational institutions to consider race as a factor when admitting students.

Some states such as California California Civil Rights Initiative , Michigan Michigan Civil Rights Initiative , and Washington Initiative have passed constitutional amendments banning public institutions, including public schools, from practicing affirmative action within their respective states.

  • The Pink ABC.
  • Looking at Affirmative Action in a New Light;
  • Affirmative Action in Perspective : Fletcher A. Blanchard : .
  • Looking for other ways to read this?;

Conservative activists have alleged that colleges quietly use illegal quotas to increase the number of minorities and have launched numerous lawsuits to stop them. Some Brazilian universities state and federal have created systems of preferred admissions quotas for racial minorities blacks and Amerindians , the poor and people with disabilities. It states, however, that such programs "shall in no case entail as a consequence the maintenance of unequal or separate rights for different racial groups after the objectives for which they were taken have been achieved".

The United Nations Human Rights Committee states that "the principle of equality sometimes requires States parties to take affirmative action in order to diminish or eliminate conditions which cause or help to perpetuate discrimination prohibited by the Covenant. For example, in a State where the general conditions of a certain part of the population prevent or impair their enjoyment of human rights, the State should take specific action to correct those conditions. Such action may involve granting for a time to the part of the population concerned certain preferential treatment in specific matters as compared with the rest of the population.

However, as long as such action is needed to correct discrimination, in fact, it is a case of legitimate differentiation under the Covenant. The principle of affirmative action is to promote societal equality through the preferential treatment of socioeconomically disadvantaged people. Often, these people are disadvantaged for historical reasons, such as oppression or slavery. A study found that affirmative action in the United States "increases the black share of employees over time: in 5 years after an establishment is first regulated, the black share of employees increases by an average of 0.

Strikingly, the black share continues to grow at a similar pace even after an establishment is deregulated. One could argue that this persistence is driven in part by affirmative action inducing employers to improve their methods for screening potential hires. According to a poll taken by USA Today in , the majority of Americans support affirmative action for women, while views on minority groups were more split. Support among blacks, unlike among whites, had almost no correlation with political affiliation. Critics of affirmative action offer a variety of arguments as to why it is counterproductive or should be discontinued.

For example, critics may argue that affirmative action hinders reconciliation, replaces old wrongs with new wrongs, undermines the achievements of minorities, and encourages individuals to identify themselves as disadvantaged, even if they are not.

Partner Sites

It may increase racial tension and benefit the more privileged people within minority groups at the expense of the least fortunate within majority groups. Some opponents of affirmative action argue that it is a form of reverse racism , that any effort to cure discrimination through affirmative action is wrong because it, in turn, is another form of discrimination.

University of Texas , which held that colleges have some discretion to consider race when making admissions decisions, demonstrate how discrimination occurs in the name of affirmative action. Some critics of affirmative action argue that affirmative action devalues the actual accomplishments of people who are chosen based on the social group to which they belong rather than their qualifications, thus rendering affirmative action counterproductive. Some argue that affirmative action policies create an opportunity for fraud, by encouraging non-preferred groups to designate themselves as members of preferred groups that is, members of groups that benefit from affirmative action in order to take advantage of group preference policies.

U Mich Affirmative Action: A Case for Psychological Science

Critics of affirmative action suggest that programs may benefit the members of the targeted group that least need the benefit, that is those who have the greatest social, economic and educational advantages within the targeted group. Another criticism of affirmative action is that it may reduce the incentives of both the preferred and non-preferred to perform at their best. Beneficiaries of affirmative action may conclude that it is unnecessary to work as hard, and those who do not benefit may perceive hard work as futile.

Mismatching is the term given to the supposed negative effect that affirmative action has when it places a student into a college that is too difficult for him or her. For example, according to the hypothesis, in the absence of affirmative action, a student will be admitted to a college that matches his or her academic ability and have a good chance of graduating. However, according to the mismatching hypothesis, affirmative action often places a student into a college that is too difficult, and this increases the student's chance of dropping out.

Thus, according to the hypothesis, affirmative action hurts its intended beneficiaries, because it increases their dropout rate. Evidence in support of the mismatching theory was presented by Gail Heriot , a professor of law at the University of San Diego and a member of the U. The study concluded that there were 7. Sander's paper on mismatching has been criticized by several law professors, including Ian Ayres and Richard Brooks from Yale who argue that eliminating affirmative action would actually reduce the number of black lawyers by Yoon confirmed Sander's mismatch findings, but also found that eliminating affirmative action would "lead to a 63 percent decline in black matriculants at all law schools and a 90 percent decline at elite law schools".

Their article found a strong indication that affirmative action results in a mismatch effect. They argued that the attendance by some African-American students to less-selective schools would significantly improve the low first attempt rate at passing the state bar , but they cautioned that such improvements could be outweighed by decreases in law school attendance.

A study proposed that mismatch can only occur when a selective school possesses private information that, had this information been disclosed, would have changed the student's choice of school. The study found that this is in fact the case for Duke University , and that this information predicts the student's academic performance after beginning college. A study on affirmative action in India fails to find evidence for the mismatching hypothesis.

  • Ville(s) rêvée(s), ville(s) vécue(s) (French Edition).
  • The Bigger Picture;
  • Jeremiah Buttons and the Hamlet of the Lost.
  • About the Author.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Part of a series on Discrimination General forms. Related topics. Policy of promoting members of groups that have previously suffered from discrimination. See also: Women in government quotas. See also: Reserved political positions. See also: Black Economic Empowerment.

This section is written in the style of a debate rather than an encyclopedic summary. It may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and make it more accessible to a general audience. Please discuss this issue on the talk page. May Learn how and when to remove this template message. Main article: Affirmative action in China. Main article: Reservation in India. Main article: Ketuanan Melayu. Main article: Affirmative action in the United States. The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject.

Social Psychology Links by Subtopic

You may improve this section , discuss the issue on the talk page , or create a new article , as appropriate. Achievement gap in the United States Affirmative action bake sale Angry white male Civil and political rights Disability rights movement Diversity business Diversity training Economic discrimination Equal opportunity Ethnic penalty " Harrison Bergeron " Jewish quota Legacy preferences Minority rights Multiculturalism Numerus clausus Political correctness Positive liberty Principle-policy puzzle Progressive stack Quotaism Reasonable accommodation Special measures for gender equality in the United Nations Strong-basis-in-evidence standard Social justice Tokenism White guilt Women's rights Substantive equality.

Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 13 February The Federal Register. Archived from the original on 30 March Retrieved 5 February Stanford University.

Log in to Wiley Online Library

Retrieved 4 June Retrieved 1 September Commission for Racial Equality. Archived from the original on 24 September UK 4 April Discrimination: your rights. Retrieved 7 April Society for History in the Federal Government. Retrieved 27 September Archived from the original on 27 May Retrieved 6 December