Definition and synonyms of enough is enough from the online English dictionary from Macmillan Education. Show more. Show less. Using the thesaurus. Close What are red words? You are coming of age in an incredibly difficult moment in American history and it takes an enormous toll on you. It takes a toll on me, too. If it feels like too much, get help for yourself from a good doctor. We have our whole lives to advocate for Israel and other causes we care about. I want you to feel empowered and bold and to never, ever silence yourself, but I also want you to protect yourself.
No matter what happened on campus last week, young Jews of America, I want you to know that I am so grateful to you—and I am not alone. You are the future of Judaism. Jewish continuity and Zionism depend on your well-being. We need you to live. We need you to thrive. Promise to take care of yourself and look out for your friends, OK? I have your back. Like this article? Carly Pildis is a political organizer and advocacy professional based in Washington, D. Her Twitter feed is carlypildis , and her website is www. Click here for access to comments.
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking.
But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective and worse. Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place. Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters tabletmag.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support. As for Harvard U.
- Neuroanatomie für Nicht-Mediziner (German Edition)!
- The Lost & Ancient Secrets of Dragon Lines, Energy Disruption Methods And Mana Blasting Strikes.
- More results?
- Become Involved.
- Enough Is Enough;
- Enough Is Enough.
Only a hundred years ago Harvard had a policy of strict quotas of Jews. Your comment may be no longer than 2, characters, approximately words. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments. That was 10 years ago. Those experiences seem quaint now. Access 1 comment. Jacob Arnon says:. I do agree with most of what Carly Pidis wrote. Looks like we'll have to take a pay cut, or undertake some serious population reduction measures.
But on p. Unemployment, greenhouse gas emissions, and poverty all fall as well. This seems to imply that while the economy won't grow, we'll still be physically better off in and thereafter than we were in On the other hand, the chart on p. It suggests that the world as a whole will be in a steady state, but that some countries the more developed ones, like the U. This seems to imply that the GDP per capita of Canada will decline all other things being equal relative to the level of And this is only the beginning of the discussion. A staple observation of many environmentalists is that we are in a state of "overshoot" -- that we are actually drawing down critical natural resources, and we need to cut back resource consumption to be sustainable.
The relationship between resource consumption and the economy is complex, but if the relationship is fairly straightforward as it likely is , then decreased resource consumption would seem to imply a declining economy, not a steady-state economy. Still others, such as Gail Tverberg, have said that no steady-state economy is possible except at a fairly low level like, basically, the technology available in or thereabouts.
No More Tears (Enough Is Enough) - Wikipedia
I personally am quite skeptical about an all-electric economy supporting anything approaching the contemporary American standard of living for any except a small elite much, much smaller than the current elite. I don't think we can prosaically assume that we can just draw the line at the economy and say that we're staying there -- or even , or This whole thing needs to be thought out from the bottom up, not the top down and thus the need to address food before addressing more weighty things like transportation and communications.
These pictures of a possible future economy are dramatically different. I don't think it is realistic to write a book about a steady-state economy and not define the size at which such an economy would function. We would allow for some inequality, of course, although ideally that would be substantially reduced, as the authors advocate.
- Related Categories.
- LGBTQ supporters say enough is enough at Hamilton City Hall - CHCH!
- How To Get Hired As A Teacher: Getting Into A School Board!
- Search form;
- Explore topics.
So we wind up finishing the book not having the most basic understanding about what this steady-state economy is going to look like. This is what is going to happen. As society continues to deteriorate around us, there will be endless discussions, arguing, and hand-wringing. In the end, nothing will be done. The result will fall into place. This may mean a complete collapse of modern civilization and a reversion to something like BCE, or even the disappearance of all life on earth in a climate change apocalypse such as that envisioned by James Hansen at the end of Storms of my Grandchildren.
Or it will be determined by chance. Or it will be determined by a small minority which will have thought out these questions outside of the realm of politics, figured it out on their own, and simply maneuvered or forced it into place. Unfortunately, this last alternative seems to be our best chance. Anyone want to give it a shot?
Do we need a steady-state economy? There's a second problem, a rather common-sense problem which many readers not convinced of the need for a steady-state economy are bound to ask. Do we really need a steady state economy to deal with today's environmental problems? Let's take, for example, the biggest problem of them all right now, climate change. Does climate change require a steady-state economy? Why couldn't we just have solar panels, wind turbines, dispense with fossil fuels, and continue to have a growing economy?
This problem is related to the first, because if there's no sense of urgency, then we can postpone the whole discussion of what a steady-state economy would look like. A renewable economy based on solar and wind might possibly grow for a small period of time, at some point -- though NOT at first. In the beginning, even in the best circumstances, such a renewable economy would likely actually shrink because the EROEI energy return on energy invested of solar and wind is lower than the EROEI for fossil fuels -- that's a lot of what makes fossil fuels so attractive as a fuel.
Moreover, the additional money and energy required to build out the new renewables infrastructure required would make a huge albeit temporary dent in the economy -- sometimes referred to as the "renewables gap. But, this needs to be explained. The authors don't talk about this. I know: it's a bit hard to explain. However, I would at least try. If you don't try, you've lost your audience or the part of the audience that can think, at any rate. Why do we need a steady-state economy in the first place? Why can't we just "grow" the economy, but just using renewables?
Ecological economists need to know the answers to these questions! My fear is that a key reason that the steady-state economy has not been popularized is not only because we have too few good writers able to communicate technical subjects. My fear is that even the technical people don't really understand these issues. Therefore, it is possible that the reason we can't popularize this subject is because we don't know what we're trying to popularize in the first place. The importance of these issues The book is also something of a milestone in the history of ecological economics.
For years ecological economics has labored under a burden. There is widespread interest in the environment, witness the growing and vast unease over climate change. There is also widespread awareness that the earth's resources are finite, witness the decades-old study The Limits to Growth. There is, finally, widespread awareness of the obvious truth that the economy is clearly tied up both with climate change, resource use, and many other environmental issues.
But despite this, awareness of ecological economics or the most basic issues related to ecological economics -- like what a steady-state economy is! The world desperately needs to spread awareness of these principles and we have reached a crisis of the first order threatening the existence of the human race because of this ignorance. At last, now, we have something approximating an attempt to disseminate the principles of ecological economics to a wider audience.
But does Enough is Enough succeed at this? While it is a milestone, the book is also rather problematic.
Follow the Author
I read through the entire book and had difficulty placing my finger on the reason. So, what's the take away from this book? What am I, the aspiring activist and advocate for a steady-state economy, supposed to scrawl on my placard as I march around in a demonstration, or write to my elected representatives, or present as ideas to my fellow environmental activists? There must be limits: that much is clear. But where should those limits be? The authors give us only the most vague of answers.
I am imagining this scenario. I am promoting Enough is Enough and after the talk, ask for questions. A hand shoots up and the questioner asks: "In a steady-state economy, about what would the average standard of living be? To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure how I'd answer them even if I were NOT promoting this book, but were promoting my own book in which I could say whatever I wanted. They are simple, but tough questions.
enough is enough
Some people may be tempted to offer a generalizing answer like this: "In a steady- state economy, we will have a European standard of living for the entire world, at a world population of 2 billion. The best and the brightest of those who are aware of the depth of our resource shortage issues know that this sort of thing will not work. A European standard of living for 2 billion is just not sustainable. By making this sort of answer, you will lose a lot of smart people.
We need specifics, or at least parameters. In their absence, people will just shrug their shoulders and move on, and the world will move into a darker phase in which the electrons which currently record these sorts of thoughts will fall silent. Feb 09, Brandon rated it liked it. An interesting read and a broad overview of the ideas behind stable state economics.
It doesn't go into any great depth on any one subject, bit instead touches on a wide breadth of subjects which determine how our environment, society, and economy all effect each other. On the whole I enjoyed it and agree with most of their analyses for the unavoidable problems our 'unlimited growth' model is hurtling us towards.
Our current society is based on an unhealthy and unfulfilling addiction to 'more'. And what we desperately need as a species is the wisdom and maturity to recognize what is 'enough' and be content with it. And that 'enough' needs to be spread equitably amongst humanity. However, I found some of their ideas a bit fluffy and unrealistic.
Others seemed to misstate the issues or be misleading. I'm particularly thinking of their 10 imagined scenes from a SSE at the end of the book, which actually describe a world that has been depopulated. On the whole the book is overly simplistic, but it's also clearly intended as an introductory primer for people who've never heard of the idea before.
And in that I think it does a good job. And the authors are correct, in that no one will have a perfect vision of the next stage of human social organization before it is constructed. Just like all of history, it will evolve in pieces as we try to improve and innovate. Until one day it will be largely complete and we'll wonder how we could ever have had such a backwards and shortsighted system as unrestrained capitalism. So for now we should all be pushing forward, holding in our minds that how humanity is currently organizing itself is unsustainable, and we should advocate for change everywhere we can.
Jun 03, Jacob North rated it it was amazing.
- Lyrics containing the term: enough is enough;
- Product Details.
- We need you!.
- Enough Is Enough () - IMDb.
Wow-what an excellent book on our current socio-econo-enviro crisis! Dietz does an excellent job pulling together so many ideas on how we can finally establish society which respects our natural resources and allows humanity to thrive by rejecting the biggest lie we've accepted-that economic growth is a satusfactory measure of progress.
Dietz lays out a charming and undeniably solid perspective of the Steady-State Economy, including our current actions, how they've failed us, potential solutions Wow-what an excellent book on our current socio-econo-enviro crisis! Dietz lays out a charming and undeniably solid perspective of the Steady-State Economy, including our current actions, how they've failed us, potential solutions, and how they can repair our sick society.
Rob came to give a talk at our university and was incredibly humble and focused on his goal to advance these ideas. Everyone needs to read this book, because the future of humanity itself depends on it, especially with how we are currently treating our planet, blinded by money and selfishness. Aug 21, Michelle rated it really liked it.
I enjoyed reading about the concepts of a steady state economy and how a society would function without the continual drive for growth. Feb 24, Lindsay Lane rated it it was ok. Enough is enough discusses economical and environmental sustainability and stresses overpopulation as the issue. It is a heavy read, and reading the whole book is unnecessary to know the point they are getting at, so I put it away. It is, to its benefit, concisely organized. Jun 02, Nicolas Quattromani rated it it was amazing.
Everyone needs to read this. Our current way of life is bringing about the apocalypse, and this book thoughtfully explains how we can still get out of our predicament. Nov 13, Jocelynn rated it it was amazing. Macro focused but very good - everyone should read. Limit resource use based on ecological criteria and our best science, implemented using economic policy tools 2. Stabilize population decreasing incentives to increase births and decrease fear people have of an ageing population in rich countries ; increase awareness and access to birth control in developing countries 3.
Limit inequality minimum income, max income 4. Re-think commerce how business creates value, move beyond financial returns, go towards environmental and social - social enterprises; and different structures as well - e. Change how we measure progress measures of human well-being, resource use, gross national happiness, genuine progress indicator Dec 30, Zomom rated it it was amazing. As someone who routinely skipped attending economics class in college due to boredom, I am surprised by how fascinated I was by this book.
The steady state economy described by the authors made more and more sense to me the further I read along in the book. While I admit I am skeptical that we can overcome what I think one of the larger hurdles is to achieving a steady state economy, i. In fact, given the state of our current economy, our environment, and our society, we MUST pursue a steady state economy as an alternative to the status quo.
The authors admit the transition from a growing economy to a steady state economy would be difficult, but they provide both the motivation for doing so happiness for people, health for the environment , and a multi-step plan for achieving it. Everyone should consider reading this very reader-friendly book, even if only to understand an alternative to the current economic system and its accompanying environmental and social problems. I know I felt encouraged and optimistic upon finishing this book that maybe we can really solve some of the world's most pressing problems, e.
Jun 30, Bradley Jarvis rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Everyone.
The steady-state economy is the desired result of ecological economics, which sees the global economy as a part of, and therefore subordinate to, the Earth's biosphere, which we are sabotaging through our pursuit of endless growth in material consumption and waste. Besides, the authors argue, our current system was designed in a totally different kind of wo "Enough is Enough" makes the case for a no-growth, or "steady-state" economy, while providing a solid set of prescriptions for creating one. Besides, the authors argue, our current system was designed in a totally different kind of world than the one we live in, where some of its most basic assumptions no longer apply, and people's lives are not being improved as expected.
Having studied this subject extensively, very little in the book is new to me, and I agree with much of it. I'm familiar with the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy CASSE , which both authors play major roles in; it has been a highly visible leader in promoting this much-needed update of traditional economics. The book effectively anticipates and responds to real and potential objections to its message, which will undoubtedly be viewed as heresy by most people who haven't already come to similar conclusions.
Those who seek it out are more likely to already agree with it, and use it as a source of common talking points in broaching the subject with others. Someone I studied an ecological economics textbook with recommended "Enough is Enough" as the best on the subject, perhaps for that reason, and it has been highly praised by pioneers in the field as a must-read for pretty much everyone else. While I would stop short at calling it the "best," it definitely belongs in the top ten, and I highly recommend it.
Jan 10, Carrie rated it it was amazing. With this book the authors simply and clearly offer concrete steps to be taken to improve the lives of the average person. Enough is Enough speaks to people about jobs, healthcare, and happiness and in doing so dismantles the myth perpetuated in our society that equates the GDP with prosperity for all and debunks the myth that conserving the environment can only be done at the expense of people and their way of life.